User talk:ReneeWrites

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, ReneeWrites!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 10:03, 30 May 2019 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Piet Hohmann - De bromtol.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Celeda 16:31, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 23 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Colectivo Licuado - Een stevige maaltijd.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 28 August 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rob en Robin - Toy cars.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Laura Lehtinen - Stallingstraat.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very cute mural and good quality. -- Ikan Kekek 01:35, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sam van der Weijden - Poort van Schoenmakers 1.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, but this feels smaller than the others, probably because of the composition of the mural. If you have larger files for each of these photos, please upload those instead of these possibly downsized files. Files submitted to QIC aren't supposed to be downsized to look sharper. -- Ikan Kekek 01:35, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jeff Canham - Alpha Bravo Charlie 1.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 04:46, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rutger Termohlen, Collin van der Sluijs & Super A - De rat 1.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 21:19, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Hedof - Heden & verleden.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 21:19, 8 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 11 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Jeff Canham - Alpha Bravo Charlie 3.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Aristeas 08:26, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Alfalfa - De mooiste duif van Breda.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Isiwal 05:52, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 12 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sam van der Weijden - Poort van Schoenmakers 2.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Moroder 12:18, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Guido de Boer - Head Dope Dead Hope 2.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Vincent60030 07:59, 13 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Zenk One - Ode aan bokslegende The Diamond.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 04:03, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 20 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Frau Isa - Alle ogen zijn gericht op Kwatta.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:08, 18 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Rutger Termohlen, Collin van der Sluijs & Super A - De rat 2.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Otecki - Ode aan de Poolse Pantserdivisie.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment Needs A better perspective correction on the right side--Moroder 02:27, 22 September 2020 (UTC)  Done --ReneeWrites 19:41, 23 September 2020 (UTC) Good quality. --Moroder 01:22, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

Thanks for your review

 Thanks for your very positive review of my QIC File:Spiti River Kaza Himachal Jun18 D72 7232.jpg "Gorgeous photo, and meets QI requirements by a mile --ReneeWrites". This encouraged me to submit it for FP. Commons:Featured_picture_candidates/File:Spiti_River_Kaza_Himachal_Jun18_D72_7232.jpg --Tagooty (talk) 04:52, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

You're very welcome, and I'm glad to see that a positive review can have that kind of impact. I see you've already got quite a bit of support on your image being nominated for FP, but I added my vote too just for good measure. --ReneeWrites (talk) 11:44, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Super A - Cybermens.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Halavar 10:01, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vincent de Boer - All happens inside 2.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 16:24, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! M-City - Robot Dino.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Rhododendrites 21:25, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vincent de Boer - All happens inside 1.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Scotch Mist 05:53, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Isakov - De Maria Hemelvaartkerk.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Image looks tilted CW. --Halavar 09:48, 25 September 2020 (UTC) Uploaded a new version & fixed the tilt. --ReneeWrites 19:49, 30 September 2020 (UTC) @Halavar: Can you let me know what you think of the new version? --ReneeWrites 22:23, 2 October 2020 (UTC)  Support Good quality now. --Halavar 09:30, 3 October 2020 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 6 October 2020 (UTC)

File:SCP-8900-EX.jpg

File:SCP-8900-EX.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: At the source, the image was replaced with File:SCP-8900-EX-new.jpg because this image is not CC-compliant. https://www.alamy.com/stock-photo-colour-images-of-the-second-world-war-43186298.html Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

User who nominated the file for deletion (Nominator) : Aismallard.

I'm a computer program; please don't ask me questions but ask the user who nominated your file(s) for deletion or at our Help Desk. //Deletion Notification Bot (talk) 12:46, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

Marking images from the SCP Wiki as non-compliant

Hello, I've added {{copyvio}} to File:SCP-529.jpg and File:SCP-8900-EX.jpg because they are non-compliant. They were replaced at the source because the images are derivatives of media which is not CC-compliant or cannot be verified as such.

I certainly don't think you meant any harm here, it is reasonable to expect that they were CC-BY-SA 3.0 due to the license banner automatically appended to all Wikidot pages. However seeing as they were removed from the SCP Wiki for being licensing violations, I don't think it's appropriate for Commons to retain them either.

Edit: I was not aware there was a bot to automatically add talk page sections based on the addition of those templates. Apologies for the additional notifications.

aismallard (talk) 12:57, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

No need to apologise, I appreciate the comment :)

And yeah, if the original image violated the SCP Wiki's terms of use, it's not appropriate to have it stay up here. ReneeWrites (talk) 22:46, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

Reminder

Hi ReneeWrites. I noticed that you've made a malformed deletion request. Here, {{Delete}} is not for speedy deletion, please see COM:DP. When you want to delete a page by manually using the {{Delete}} template (rather than the automatic Nominate for deletion tool in the Tools menu on the sidebar per COM:DR#Starting requests), you must follow the instructions in the template, including the "Click here to show further instructions" portion (or Commons:Deletion requests/Listing a request manually policy), otherwise you will create a lot of work for other people.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 16:27, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

Hi Jeff! I saw the malformed deletion req category, but I didn't know how to fix it, or even why it was throwing an error even though I had filled in all the parameters it told me to fill. I saw that you have gone ahead and fixed the faulty request, thank you for that. ReneeWrites (talk) 17:21, 25 April 2022 (UTC)

You're welcome. You didn't ping me, so I didn't see your reply until now.   — Jeff G. ツ _{please ping or talk to me} 11:58, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

File:Barbourula kalimantanensis.jpg

File:Barbourula kalimantanensis.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

--Abalg (talk) 08:25, 4 May 2022 (UTC)

Category:Polaroid_Land_Camera

Polaroid Land Camera has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

86.103.239.238 11:42, 21 September 2022 (UTC)

Meta categories

Hi, ReneeWrites. Thank you for creating meta categories, such as Category:Magazine advertisements by brand. When you create a meta category, please remember to include the appropriate sort criterion parameter on the {{Metacat}} template. Thanks. -- Auntof6 (talk) 04:46, 29 January 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads up! I didn't know this, and will keep this in mind for the future. I went back to check the meta categories I'd made and tagged and saw you already went ahead and filled in the parameters as well, that's really appreciated :) ReneeWrites (talk) 10:52, 29 January 2023 (UTC)

Files uploaded by G.H. Saber

Thanks @ReneeWrites . Vdastpak1 (talk) 20:43, 25 February 2023 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Tam Pháp Ty ấn (叄法司印).svg

Copyright status: File:Tam Pháp Ty ấn (叄法司印).svg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading File:Tam Pháp Ty ấn (叄法司印).svg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear. If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.) If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there. Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

This action was performed automatically by AntiCompositeBot (talk) (FAQ) 23:06, 20 June 2023 (UTC)

File:Tam Pháp Ty ấn (叄法司印).svg

File:Tam Pháp Ty ấn (叄法司印).svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 23:22, 20 June 2023 (UTC)

• Ik heb het probleem al opgelost, blijkbaar was je de "-by-" in de sjabloon vergeten. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 23:31, 20 June 2023 (UTC)

  Bedankt :) ReneeWrites (talk) 07:05, 21 June 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for your contributions to East Asian & Vietnamese sigillography

		The Barnstar of Oriental sigillography
		Voor alle Viëtnamese Nguyễn-Dynastie en Chinese (Taiwanese) regeringszegels die je hebt gevectoriseerd. Ik ben blij met het geweldige werk dat je in dit gebied hebt geleverd. Voor context the text Chương Mỹ Bội tinh (彰美佩星) is Klassiek Chinees voor "De Ster van Verdienste". --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 10:46, 22 June 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Protestantse Kerk Zundert preekstoel 3.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 21:35, 29 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 2 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! De Vlucht uit Breda.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:15, 30 June 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 3 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! De Uitdaging Ulvenhout.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --PaestumPaestum 18:44, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 1958 Chevrolet Bel Air.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments The verticals should be corrected and the car at the right cropped out. --Ermell 20:14, 30 June 2023 (UTC) Perspective and color corrected. Good quality and beautiful image now in my opinion. -- Spurzem 11:22, 1 July 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 4 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sint-Trudokerk Zundert embleem.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments it needs a more specific cat --Poco a poco 07:32, 1 July 2023 (UTC) @Poco a poco: Added a few extra cats, I hope these are alright. ReneeWrites 20:24, 1 July 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 14:23, 2 July 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 5 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haven 10, Raamsdonksveer.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:54, 3 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Kerk Wernhout entree.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:54, 3 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Melati Flowers & Rice Fields front.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:52, 3 July 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Royal Standard of Amanullah Khan (reverse).svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Grunpfnul 07:05, 4 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Môn Hạ Sảnh ấn (門下省印).svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Grunpfnul 07:05, 4 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Dorpspomp Markt, Geertruidenberg.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Grunpfnul 12:33, 4 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sint Bavokerk Rijsbergen 3.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Adding metadata and English description on the file page would be fine. --Milseburg 20:38, 29 June 2023 (UTC) @Milseburg: Added English metadata ReneeWrites 12:19, 30 June 2023 (UTC) Thanks for adding English description, but Metadata still missing. --Milseburg 17:35, 30 June 2023 (UTC) I don't know how to add to or change the exif metadata after an image has already been uploaded. Is there a way to do that? ReneeWrites 19:58, 1 July 2023 (UTC) See Commons:Exif. Your camera will definitely provide EXIF data. For further work you should see where they are lost in your workflow and try to prevent this. Metadata is not mandatory, but recommended, especially with regard to the color space and the potential of the camera used.--Milseburg 07:52, 2 July 2023 (UTC) I don't know how to add exif metadata to a file that's already been uploaded, sorry. I don't see any fields or templates where I can add that information. ReneeWrites 10:42, 3 July 2023 (UTC) Simply upload a new version of the image with those data. --Milseburg 11:57, 3 July 2023 (UTC) It worked! ReneeWrites 22:05, 3 July 2023 (UTC) Yes, try specifying other default settings like exposure time, f-number, ISO sensitivity, focal length and color space next time as well. --Milseburg 14:51, 4 July 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 7 July 2023 (UTC)

Hello

Hello, I saw that you centered my Mural crown photo, thanks for that. I just wanted to see if you could crop this too (mainly on the left, to be the same size on both sides), File:AM_Eagle.jpg, thanks in advance. 多多123 18:19, 7 July 2023 (UTC)

@多多123: Sure! It's no trouble at all. I uploaded a new version 🙂 ReneeWrites (talk) 22:38, 7 July 2023 (UTC)

@ReneeWrites: thank you! 多多123 11:05, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sint-Trudokerk Zundert entree 1.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:30, 5 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! De Hoop, Princenhage 1.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --N. Johannes 20:37, 5 July 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --N. Johannes 20:37, 5 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haven 18, Raamsdonksveer.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --N. Johannes 20:37, 5 July 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Willibrorduskerk Teteringen 3.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Νικόλαος Κυριακάκης 06:01, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Protestantse Kerk Zundert vanuit preekstoel.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:15, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Protestantse Kerk Zundert 5.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. English description would be nice. --Ermell 06:18, 6 July 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 9 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Heuvel 18, Oosterhout.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:21, 7 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Văn thư phòng quan phòng (文書房關防).svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --多多123 17:40, 7 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Việt Nam Quốc Vương chi ấn (越南國王之印).svg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --多多123 17:40, 7 July 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pools Monument, Bavel 1.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:25, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Pools Monument, Bavel 2.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:25, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vlucht van de techniek, Raamsdonksveer 1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Grunpfnul 08:20, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Vlucht van de techniek, Raamsdonksveer 3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:25, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Koninginnen - Wilhelminastraat Breda 2.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Grunpfnul 07:13, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mechelen OLV over de Dijle vestibule ceiling.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Grunpfnul 11:23, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Ginnekenweg 291, Breda 2.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Grunpfnul 08:23, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haven 10, Raamsdonksveer voorkant.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Grunpfnul 07:05, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! De Hoop, Princenhage 2.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments perspective distortion and a small amount of tilt to the left --Grunpfnul 06:28, 2 July 2023 (UTC) @Grunpfnul: Fixed the perspective. ReneeWrites 10:44, 3 July 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Grunpfnul 19:08, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! De Eland - Thorbeckeplein Breda 6.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good enough --Grunpfnul 06:56, 8 July 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 11 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! St Willibrorduskerk Teteringen 2.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality, but leaning in - can you apply a perspective correction? --Mike Peel 10:20, 8 July 2023 (UTC)  Done Thanks for the review, I applied the pespective changes. ReneeWrites 13:38, 8 July 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 10:01, 9 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Corneliuskerk Heilige Hartbeeld, Den Hout.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Perspective distortion, digital noise in the sky, crop not 100% centered on the figure (discussable) - Fixable? --Grunpfnul 08:27, 8 July 2023 (UTC)  Done Thanks for the review, I fixed all those things. ReneeWrites 09:52, 9 July 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --Grunpfnul 15:33, 9 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Citadelmonument Hervormde Kerk Ginneken 3.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Grunpfnul 18:14, 9 July 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 12 July 2023 (UTC)

If you have time...

If you have the time for it, I need 8 images to be fixed, here are the fixes and the images needed:

• 
  Needs rotating 270 degrees to the right (or 90 to the left)
• 
  Needs brightening
• 
  Needs slight tilting and brightening
• 
  Slight tilting
• 
  Slight tilting and overexposure
• 
  Brightening
• 
  Background whitening and brightening the object
• 
  Brightening

Thank you, 多多123 18:34, 12 July 2023 (UTC)

@多多123: Done. Let me know if you need any more changes 🙂 ReneeWrites (talk) 21:41, 12 July 2023 (UTC)

@ReneeWrites: Wow! Thank you very much. 多多123 14:30, 13 July 2023 (UTC)
I think the cropped version of your QI improved the quality, I just think that the CA isn't removable as it's just too much, it's still good either way. 多多123 14:30, 13 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haagweg 366, Breda.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:52, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Haagweg 366, Breda 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:55, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reliëf kruisiging van Jezus 1.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 18:02, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reliëf kruisiging van Jezus 2.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 18:02, 10 July 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 13 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Toyota Dome - Raamsdonksveer 2.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --多多123 10:54, 12 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sandoel 44 - Raamsdonksveer 1.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 19:19, 12 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reliëf kruisiging van Jezus 3.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 10:01, 12 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reliëf kruisiging van Jezus 4.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 10:01, 12 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reliëf kruisiging van Jezus 5.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 10:01, 12 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reliëf kruisiging van Jezus 6.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 10:01, 12 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Frau Isa - De Chocoladefabriek.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 10:02, 12 July 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

Hello!

Thanks for your other edits on the other images, I just need one image this time.

• 
  Needs slight brightening

多多123 18:46, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

@多多123:  Done! Let me know if you need anything else 🙂 ReneeWrites (talk) 20:27, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

@ReneeWrites: Thank you! *copies emoji* 🙂 多多123 20:52, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

File:Speedcube GAN.jpg needs slight brightening and small noise reduction, and CA fixing.

File:Kodak Brownie 127.jpg needs slight brightnening and small noise reduction. Thanks in advance! :D 多多123 21:00, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

@ReneeWrites: ping just incase 多多123 20:40, 16 July 2023 (UTC)

@多多123: Done! ReneeWrites (talk) 00:36, 17 July 2023 (UTC)

About the Samsung phone: Most of the criticisms at the QI assessment stem from the phone being laid horizontal, it wouldn't be difficult for me to rotate it 90 degrees and remove or adjust the shadows accordingly, though I wouldn't make these changes if you're not okay with me doing that.

(Also, I'm not sure if it would count as a conflict of interests if I added my own support vote to submissions I edited, which is why I've been hesitant to do that.) ReneeWrites (talk) 01:09, 17 July 2023 (UTC)

There doesn't seem to be any strict rules stating anything, depending on the quality of the images you may vote and someone else may discuss it if they'd like to, if you're just unbiased nothing will happen :) 多多123 09:38, 17 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sint-Trudokerk Zundert tabernakel.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Аныл Озташ 23:45, 13 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Toyota Dome - Raamsdonksveer 4.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice composition, but there's some slight CA on the roof of the entrance[?] to the left, is it fixable? --多多123 10:53, 12 July 2023 (UTC) Removed the CA above the left arch, let me know if any more changes need to be made. ReneeWrites 16:38, 12 July 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --多多123 15:01, 13 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Toyota Dome - Raamsdonksveer 1.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments A slight crop on the left where the white column is visible would be best, to center the middle intersection. --多多123 10:54, 12 July 2023 (UTC)  Done Thanks for the review! I uploaded a new version with the crop. ReneeWrites 16:38, 12 July 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality. --多多123 15:01, 13 July 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 16 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reliëf kruisiging van Jezus 7.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Spurzem 12:13, 14 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reliëf kruisiging van Jezus 8.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 06:59, 14 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reliëf kruisiging van Jezus 9.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:00, 14 July 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 17 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mechelen OLV over de Dijle hoogaltaar detail 2.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --多多123 18:51, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mechelen OLV over de Dijle hoogaltaar detail 5.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --多多123 18:51, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reliëf kruisiging van Jezus 11.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Grunpfnul 10:47, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reliëf kruisiging van Jezus 12.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Grunpfnul 10:47, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reliëf kruisiging van Jezus 13.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Grunpfnul 10:47, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Reliëf kruisiging van Jezus 14.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Grunpfnul 10:47, 15 July 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 18 July 2023 (UTC)

File:MDR-ZX310.jpg

Hello! I need slight brightening and noise reduction on these images...

• File:MDR-ZX310.jpg
• File:MDR-ZX310 2.jpg
• File:MDR-ZX310 3.jpg

Thank you! 多多123 22:57, 18 July 2023 (UTC)

Hi @多多123: That won't be an issue, but it's midnight here and I was just about to head to bed, so I won't have them ready until tomorrow. ReneeWrites (talk) 23:02, 18 July 2023 (UTC)

That's about right. See you tomorrow! 多多123 23:03, 18 July 2023 (UTC)

@多多123: Done! ReneeWrites (talk) 15:24, 19 July 2023 (UTC)

Thank you! @ReneeWrites 多多123 19:59, 19 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Sandoel 42 - Raamsdonksveer 1.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Tilted Poco a poco 17:46, 12 July 2023 (UTC)  Done Fixed it! (I overlooked this comment the first time around, sorry) ReneeWrites 06:56, 15 July 2023 (UTC)  Support Good quality now. --多多123 19:25, 16 July 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 19 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grote Kerk Breda entree.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Tagooty 01:07, 18 July 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 20 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grote Kerk Breda gewelf boven hoogkoor 1.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Ermell 05:36, 18 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grote Kerk Breda zijbeuk 2.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:23, 18 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grote Kerk Breda zijbeuk 3.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Just ok --Poco a poco 17:39, 18 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Entree Sint-Laurentiuskerk, Ginneken - detail.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 06:58, 18 July 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 21 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grote Kerk Breda grafmonument van Renesse en van Hemel 1.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 19:08, 19 July 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 22 July 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Grote Kerk Breda grafmonument van Renesse en van Hemel detail 1.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 10:51, 23 July 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Mechelen OLV over de Dijle hoogaltaar detail 4.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 07:27, 23 July 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 26 July 2023 (UTC)

CA

Hi, Renee! I got my Nikon SB-910 and I built a DIY light box for now... This is one of the results, but there's some chromatic aberration, can you remove it for me please? It's on the left and right, thank you. :)

• 

多多123 10:12, 5 August 2023 (UTC)

I also need CA removal from

if you can :) 多多123 10:32, 5 August 2023 (UTC)

@多多123: I uploaded a new version, let me know what you think. ReneeWrites (talk) 16:43, 5 August 2023 (UTC)

@ReneeWrites: Yep! It's way better now. 多多123 20:51, 6 August 2023 (UTC)

Noise

Hi, Renee! Thanks for your work recently, I found this hiding somewhere... and got some origami sheets out to photograph it, it's different to normal photos I usually take. :) I was wondering if you could remove the noise slightly? Thank you.

• Plants vs. Zombies handheld console.jpg

  Plants vs. Zombies handheld console.jpg

• Plants vs. Zombies handheld console 2.jpg

  Plants vs. Zombies handheld console 2.jpg

• 

  Plants vs. Zombies handheld console 3.jpg

• 

  Plants vs. Zombies handheld console 4.jpg

多多123 20:44, 8 August 2023 (UTC)

If you have the time, I need noise reduction from these too.

• 

  Speedcube MoYu 2022.jpg

• 

  Speedcube MoYu 2022 2.jpg

Thank you. 多多123 12:04, 9 August 2023 (UTC)

Hey @多多123: I uploaded a new version of these files, let me know if you need anything else 🙂

You got a really powerful camera on your hands by the way, there's an incredible amount of detail especially on the PvZ handheld console pictures. ReneeWrites (talk) 13:41, 9 August 2023 (UTC)

Thanks, but I'm still thinking of upgrading in the next few years... It's a good 24MPs camera, but I think a Sony might be better. :) 多多123 15:05, 9 August 2023 (UTC)

@ReneeWrites: According to the people over at COM:QIC... the PvZ images are too soft. Could you do something about that if it's possible? I don't know if you have that type of software, it's fine either way. Thank you. 多多123 20:49, 9 August 2023 (UTC)

@多多123: I uploaded a new version of the PvZ consoles, these should be sharp enough. ReneeWrites (talk) 23:55, 9 August 2023 (UTC)

@ReneeWrites: Thank you! 多多123 16:24, 10 August 2023 (UTC)

File:Plants vs. Zombies handheld console.jpg

File:Plants vs. Zombies handheld console.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

86.48.10.55 21:13, 11 August 2023 (UTC)

File:Plants vs. Zombies handheld console 2.jpg

File:Plants vs. Zombies handheld console 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

86.48.10.55 21:14, 11 August 2023 (UTC)

A chance to try out the information from the video I sent you!

• 

  MoYu accessories box.jpg

• 

  MoYu accessories box 2.jpg

I need some details, please, before I can nominate this for COM:QIC, I already checked for Copyvio and have added information in the description of the file. This one won't get deleted... Hopefully. Thank you! :) 多多123 19:40, 13 August 2023 (UTC)

@多多123: I uploaded a new version for both files. I think the first box should pass QI just fine. I increased the crop at the top and bottom a little, people might think it's too close otherwise. The second image has a low depth of field (the back of the box is blurred) and I can't fix that, so you might get comments on that. ReneeWrites (talk) 15:36, 14 August 2023 (UTC)

@ReneeWrites: Thank you! I might get a comment for "upscaling" this time... I don't think that should be an issue if it doesn't necessarily create any new details which weren't already there. I intentionally framed for the logo, as it's the main focus of the image. It would be quite hard to get a focus stack at this angle and get it right without moving slightly... I was wondering if you use photoshop? I might start to do some more images so that you could focus stack them, if you had the time and wanted to do so, of course. Thank you again! 🙂👍 多多123 16:21, 14 August 2023 (UTC)

@多多123: I do use Photoshop! And yes, I'm okay with focus stacking. ReneeWrites (talk) 17:03, 14 August 2023 (UTC)

Japanese municipal logos

Can you upload all logos of Japanese municipalities? Thanks. SpinnerLaserzthe2nd (talk) 14:23, 14 August 2023 (UTC)

Sure. All in due time, though. ReneeWrites (talk) 14:37, 14 August 2023 (UTC)

Focus Stacking

Hey, Renee! I took 4 images of thread today. I was wondering if you could focus stack them into a better DoF image? And remove noise, slightly, and also dust speckles (from the final image). Thank you! Link to images. 多多123 18:45, 16 August 2023 (UTC)

You can upload the final image to imgur and send me a link so that I can upload it or you can upload it if you want. Either one is fine. :) 多多123 19:58, 16 August 2023 (UTC)

Also, if you could sharpen the final image slightly. Thank you! 多多123 20:15, 16 August 2023 (UTC)

@多多123: Will keep all of that in mind! Still working on changing file descriptions etc. on a batch of images I uploaded today, so I'll most likely get to it tomorrow. ReneeWrites (talk) 20:26, 16 August 2023 (UTC)

@ReneeWrites: Wow, that was quite a fast reply. That's fine, also, I found User:XRay who has some nice templates, here's the link to the ones I liked. I don't know if you'll like them too, but I have started to use them. He's really good with templates. :) User:XRay/Templates/Credits/cc-by-sa User:XRay/Templates/Technical specifications 多多123 20:34, 16 August 2023 (UTC)

I've used it on File:Speedcube MoYu 2022.jpg. 多多123 20:48, 16 August 2023 (UTC)

Thank you. I'm happy if you use the templates as a template for your own. If there is more interest, we can also make general templates out of it. --XRay 💬 04:25, 17 August 2023 (UTC)

@XRay: It depends if other people like it, we or you would have to add different licences too, I am very happy to help. :) 多多123 12:33, 17 August 2023 (UTC)

@多多123: Here's the finished image: https://i.imgur.com/hzzQyYK.jpg. There is some light fuzziness, but hopefully not enough to be an issue for QI. ReneeWrites (talk) 12:22, 17 August 2023 (UTC)

@ReneeWrites: Thank you! It looks way better. 多多123 12:35, 17 August 2023 (UTC)

@ReneeWrites: Hello again! I took another 7 images, here they are [1]. I was hoping you could stack these too, please, as well as

remove noise, slightly, and also dust speckles (from the final image).

I will also need detail enhancing. Thank you! 多多123 19:41, 17 August 2023 (UTC)

@多多123: Here's the finished image: https://i.imgur.com/3vC58qI.png ReneeWrites (talk) 21:57, 17 August 2023 (UTC)

@ReneeWrites: It's quite out of focus... It's still one of my favourite images, I'll save it in my folder and try to get some more shots. Thank you for doing the best you can! 多多123 22:34, 17 August 2023 (UTC)

It's entirely my fault, but I won't give up. :) 多多123 22:39, 17 August 2023 (UTC)

@ReneeWrites: Could you please

1. Focus stack these images [2]
2. Remove dust specks.
3. Mask the screwdriver and select only the background to up the exposure so there's nearly no paper left, only white.

?

Thank you! 多多123 23:54, 19 August 2023 (UTC)

@多多123: Here's the final image, let me know what you think: https://i.imgur.com/f0niQx2.png ReneeWrites (talk) 12:26, 21 August 2023 (UTC)

@ReneeWrites: Hmmm, it seems to be quite smooth, could you sharpen it a bunch? Thank you! 多多123 13:08, 21 August 2023 (UTC)

@多多123: How's this? https://i.imgur.com/6BlKaVz.png ReneeWrites (talk) 13:10, 21 August 2023 (UTC)

@ReneeWrites: That should be fine now. 🙂 多多123 13:17, 21 August 2023 (UTC)

@ReneeWrites: I've seen your awesome work of SVGs with other diagrams... I was hoping you might be able to make one of this? [3] Thank you again! 多多123 13:19, 21 August 2023 (UTC)

@多多123: I can do that, yeah. Does this organisation have a category on Commons, or a Wikidata item? ReneeWrites (talk) 13:25, 21 August 2023 (UTC)

Not really, that's why I want to upload the logo and I'll take more images of their products. Do they need one? 多多123 13:27, 21 August 2023 (UTC)

@ReneeWrites: Ah! So, the reason Baxa is unheard is because it's a "Privately Held Corporation". In 2011, Baxter international "set out to buy Baxa". In November of the same year Baxter successfully acquired Baxa and is now the parent organisation. ^[4] However, the NHS still circulates products with the Trademark "Baxa". 多多123 13:36, 21 August 2023 (UTC)

Q761965 多多123 13:36, 21 August 2023 (UTC)

@ReneeWrites: Could you also remove dust speckles from File:Baxa_syringe.jpg? Thank you! 多多123 18:03, 22 August 2023 (UTC)

@多多123: Done! ReneeWrites (talk) 12:13, 23 August 2023 (UTC)

@ReneeWrites: Can you now mask the syringe and

and select only the background to up the exposure so there's nearly no paper left, only white.

?

Thank you! 多多123 12:23, 23 August 2023 (UTC)

@多多123: Done. ReneeWrites (talk) 18:46, 23 August 2023 (UTC)

@ReneeWrites: I have yet another image if you can, please! The instructions on what I need done are on the link, if you can't do any of those listed don't worry. [5] :) 多多123 21:33, 24 August 2023 (UTC)

@多多123: That shouldn't be an issue. I also noticed some CR on the letters, I can remove that too. I will be busy for most of tomorrow, though, so I might not have it ready until the day after depending on how that goes. ReneeWrites (talk) 21:38, 24 August 2023 (UTC)

@ReneeWrites: Oh, yes, chromatic aberration! That's fine thank you, there's no hurry. 多多123 21:40, 24 August 2023 (UTC)

@ReneeWrites: I also have another one, even though you haven't done that one. Don't worry if you can't do it tomorrow. This one please. 多多123 20:12, 25 August 2023 (UTC)

@多多123: Here's the finished images: https://i.imgur.com/xV5Oi4l.jpg https://i.imgur.com/A3u4chN.jpg ReneeWrites (talk) 08:30, 26 August 2023 (UTC)

@ReneeWrites: Thank you! 多多123 15:29, 26 August 2023 (UTC)

@ReneeWrites: Please, if you can, I need CA removal and sharpening, as well as registration plate blurring for the following images (thank you!):

File:Porsche 911 Carrera Stratstone.jpg

File:Porsche 911 Carrera 964 Stratstone 2.jpg

File:2018 Porsche 718 Cayman.jpg

File:BMW X6 Stratstone.jpg

File:2020 BMW 4.jpg

File:BMW Z4 M40i.jpg 多多123 15:34, 27 August 2023 (UTC)

The ones that say BMW Approved, Porsche Approved don't need blurring, only the ones in the background with those. 多多123 17:02, 27 August 2023 (UTC)

File:MINI Convertible F.jpg and File:MINI Convertible.jpg too, please! :) 多多123 17:18, 27 August 2023 (UTC)

@多多123: I uploaded a new version of these files. I won't be doing any more of these. I like doing photomanipulations or restorations like with your earlier photos, but if you need someone to increase sharpness/add detail/remove CA, I think it's best you look for someone else. ReneeWrites (talk) 22:50, 27 August 2023 (UTC)

@ReneeWrites: Ok, that's fine. :) Would you know anyone else? I can always ask PawełMM. Photomanipulations includes focus stacking and blurring right? Those are altering reality slightly. 多多123 17:12, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

@多多123: Yeah, I'm fine with still doing focus stacks. ReneeWrites (talk) 17:18, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

Flag maps

If you have enough time, could you create the flag maps of Basutoland, Bechuanaland, British Kenya, Rhodesia and Nyasaland, and British Swaziland? Please and thank you. ColorfulSmoke (talk) 04:02, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

Focus stack

Hey, Renee! Here's a photomanipulation for you, if you can please. Thank you. :) [6] 多多123 16:26, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

@多多123: Here's the finished image: https://i.imgur.com/il38vsE.png ReneeWrites (talk) 11:14, 11 September 2023 (UTC)

@ReneeWrites: Thank you! 多多123 12:52, 11 September 2023 (UTC)

Welcome, Dear Filemover!

---

Hi ReneeWrites, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:

• Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{Rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one. Or, if there was no rename-request, please use the Move & Replace-tab.
• Please leave a redirect behind unless you have a valid reason not to do so. Other projects, including those using InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references. Please see this section of the file rename guideline for more information.
• Please know and follow the file rename guidelines.

AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 18:42, 11 September 2023 (UTC)

Question

Hello! I see you're active at Commons:Graphic Lab/Illustration workshop and was wondering if you'd be willing to help me with a personal project outside of Wikipedia. I need a logo converted over to SVG however, I can't seem to get it! I have three different files needing converted... a .jpg, .png, and .psd. Would you be able/willing to assist me with this? If not, I totally understand, but I wanted to reach out! Thanks, Corky 17:44, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

Hi @Corkythehornetfan: Sure, I'm willing to help with that 🙂 ReneeWrites (talk) 18:14, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

Awesome, thank you! I’ll send you an email from here. I can send the files to you once you reply to the email! Corky 19:09, 17 September 2023 (UTC)

Hartelijk dank

Hartelijk dank, maar hoe heb je dat gedaan? GoldenArtists (talk) 18:24, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

@GoldenArtists: Graag gedaan 🙂 Ik gebruik gewoon Photoshop CS5. Hopelijk is het schilderij van Van Gogh nu goed genoeg om door QI te komen. Als je de volledige versie van Still life with a plate of onions upload kan ik die waarschijnlijk ook retoucheren. ReneeWrites (talk) 19:51, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

Dit is de foto met het frame[7], ik had eerlijk gezegd niet gedacht dat je zoveel had afgeknipt. Als u een wonder kunt verrichten, wil ik u nogmaals bedanken.Fijne avond. GoldenArtists (talk) 20:27, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

@GoldenArtists: Ik denk dat me dat niet gaat lukken. De schaduwen zijn te donker, dus ik kan er weinig uit halen. Sorry :( ReneeWrites (talk) 20:50, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

Geen probleem, ik begrijp niet waarom die centimeter dat probleem veroorzaakt, maar oké. Je bent veel te aardig geweest. Ik zal je lastigvallen voor andere klusjes :p. Nogmaals bedankt GoldenArtists (talk) 21:01, 28 September 2023 (UTC)

Thank you!

Thank you for implementing {{By plain color}}!!! Smasongarrison (talk) 16:32, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

You're welcome :) ReneeWrites (talk) 17:36, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cream Citroën Burton side view.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GoldenArtists 17:28, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cream Citroën Burton three-quarter back view.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GoldenArtists 17:29, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Cream Citroën Burton three-quarter front view.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --GoldenArtists 17:29, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Watertoren Wilhelminasingel Breda 20230823 - 1.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support OK (Why png?) --C messier 19:23, 30 September 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 3 October 2023 (UTC)

Thank you

Thanks for catching and fixing all my tricyclodecane typos. Innerstream (talk) 14:57, 4 October 2023 (UTC)

No problem 🙂 ReneeWrites (talk) 20:54, 4 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Watertoren Wilhelminasingel Breda 20230823 - 3.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Comment There is a spot (see note). --C messier 19:23, 30 September 2023 (UTC) Thanks for the keen observation, I removed the spot! ReneeWrites 08:23, 1 October 2023 (UTC) Support Good quality. --C messier 17:23, 3 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

Focus stack

Hey, Renee! I got my hands on a Canon EOS 2000D, and I tested Canon's colours, I like them a lot, even more than Nikon. I've compiled a few images of a doughnut in an Imgur link for you [8], if you can focus stack them please, I tried it myself but I got blotchy results everywhere. Thank you! 多多123 12:42, 10 October 2023 (UTC)

Hey @多多123: the focus stack is ready: https://i.imgur.com/Z0rcTxW.jpg

Also, a small heads up that I'll be on holiday until the 28th starting tomorrow, so I won't be able to do any photo editing until then. ReneeWrites (talk) 11:38, 11 October 2023 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! Levensboom Princenhage Breda.png, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --MB-one 11:11, 8 October 2023 (UTC)

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 11 October 2023 (UTC)

File Doesn't Exist

Thank you for upload svg file. But in this edit w:zh:Special:Diff/79627367 in Chinese wikipedia, the file "File:Spherical disdyakis dodecahedron.svg" File Doesn't Exist (See here :w:zh:六角柱&oldid=79627367#大斜方截半變異對稱性 above the text "V4.6.8"), I have changed the svg file back to png file. You have added a file that does not exist, please pay more attention to this, thank you. good luck.-- Nanachi🐰Fruit Tea☕（宇帆·☎️·☘️） 23:52, 4 November 2023 (UTC)

@A2569875: Thanks for catching that, and for fixing my mistake 🙂 I do try to be careful (which is why I upload these images in sets, which makes it easier to keep track of things) but I will be extra vigilant. ReneeWrites (talk) 00:01, 5 November 2023 (UTC)