User talk:Dqfn13

Welcome to my talk page. If you prefer to write me in Dutch: be my guest, it is my native tongue. On the matter of photographs: I do not work on commission, but I will listen to requests for photographs of rijksmonuments, or other buildings in, or near my home town. If you want to contact me quickly: use my Dutch talk page

Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Dqfn13!

First steps tutorial Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. Getting help More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump.

Goodies, tips, and tricks Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your graphic abilities. You can find the files you have uploaded in your Uploads. Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~. To link to an image page without embedding the image, type: [[:File:Foo.jpg]], which produces: File:Foo.jpg. You may enable gadgets (custom features) for your account. There are several tools to upload files. Have you edited Wikipedia before? This guide might be useful. Made a mistake? Do you want to have a file renamed or moved? Use the move link and wait for an authorized user to rename it. Do you want to have your recently uploaded picture removed? Tag it as {{speedy|reason here}}. For more information read the deletion guidelines.

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, Dqfn13!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations").

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 13:42, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

• Image:Beeld op de Kattenburgergracht.jpg was uncategorized on 19 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:42, 20 September 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Ritsevoort 20, Alkmaar.jpg was uncategorized on 23 September 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 11:53, 24 September 2011 (UTC)
• Image:Gevelsteen schuilkerk Drie Tulpen.jpg was uncategorized on 6 October 2011 CategorizationBot (talk) 13:20, 7 October 2011 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished

Dear Dqfn13, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help. You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 21:09, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Attend the award ceremony of the Dutch Wiki Loves Monuments 2011

Dear Dqfn13, We've already thanked you for your contribution to the Wiki Loves monuments photo contest. But with a contest, there are prizes to win! The award ceremony will be held in Utrecht on Saturday the 5th of November, at the end of the Dutch Wikimedia Conference at Media Plaza, held the same day. Media Plaza is located next to the Central Station in Utrecht, in the middle of the shopping mall. Admittance is free from 3pm onwards, just in time to catch the last few presentations at the WCN. Off course you can join us for the full day conference as well and enjoy a day full of information on wiki's and cultural heritage. After the ceremony, our location sponsor generously offers a free drink to everyone! Remember: in order to make a chance to win, you need a confirmed e-mail address added to your Commons settings. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team and the Dutch Wikimedia Conference team

Sent by Lucia Bot^talk in 23:16, 24 October 2011 (UTC)

Lossy rotation

Please don't use lossy rotation as you did at File:394 Meeting Street.jpg and File:Sinter-claes-saint-nicolas-dam800.jpg. These files will have to be reverted and rotated the correct way instead. The way to rotate files is to add {{rotate|α}} for clockwise rotation by α degrees. By doing that, a bot will rotate the files the way they're supposed to be rotated. See User talk:Rotatebot#Dubble rotate for the discussion that your lossy rotations have caused. --Stefan4 (talk) 07:42, 8 December 2011 (UTC)

Thanks, I was just acting in good faith. Next time I'll do it the way you've just explained to me. Dqfn13 (talk) 07:53, 8 December 2011 (UTC)

File:Bloemend. Bloemend.sew.117 Villa Buen Retiro.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 14:20, 4 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Jacob van den Ban en Lena de Vree.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 17:00, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Jacob van den ban.jpg

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 17:00, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments NL

Beste Dqfn13,

Alle winnende foto's van Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 zijn ondertussen gedrukt als kalenders.

Wikimedia Nederland stelt er hier 100 van beschikbaar voor alle uploaders van de afbeeldingen. Geef op de bijgevoegde link je naam en adres en we sturen je kosteloos een exemplaar toe, als dank voor je deelname! Let op: op = op!! Bestel hier één kalender per adres.

Ook dit jaar zal er in september weer een Nederlandse Wiki Loves Monuments plaatsvinden, als onderdeel van de internationale wedstrijd. Meer informatie vind je tegen die tijd op http://www.wikilovesmonuments.nl/.
Ook zoeken wij nog vrijwilligers die het leuk vinden om mee te helpen met het organiseren van de landelijke wedstrijd of van locale evenementen (een "Wiki takes..." in je eigen woonplaats dus!). Meer informatie daarover vind je op de wiki van Wikimedia Nederland.

Sent by Lucia Bot^talk in 14:53, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

File:Overzicht beeldentuin Kroller-Muller.JPG

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 10:19, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

---

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012! Dear Dqfn13, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 02:41, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Kop van een negerin, Kröller-Müller Museum.JPG

File:Kop van een negerin, Kröller-Müller Museum.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Vera (talk) 20:23, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Kop van een negerin, Kröller-Müller Museum.JPG

File:Kop van een negerin, Kröller-Müller Museum.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 21:25, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Category:Gable stones in the Netherlands

Ik had de category nog niet toegevoegd omdat er bij mij twijfel was over de Engelse omschrijving van gevelstenen. Het komt op mij vreemd over dat er kennelijk alleen gevelstenen zijn in Nederland en Zweden. Daar geloof ik niet in. Maar al rondkijkende vond ik nog niet hoe de Engelssprekenden die dingen noemen. --Stunteltje (talk) 15:37, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

Geeft niet, ik weet eerlijk gezegd ook nergens anders gevelstenen, zelfs in Londen en Brussel heb ik ze niet gezien. Maar ze zijn nu toegevoegd, ik heb het alleen gedaan om je te helpen. Dqfn13 (talk) 17:46, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

Waarvoor mijn dank, no problem. En daarom meldde ik ook de reden van vertraging. Kom ik er nog een keer achter dat er een betere aanduiding is, zet ik alles wel over met Cat-a-lot. --Stunteltje (talk) 19:19, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

Op dit moment is er nog geen Category:Gablestones in Zoetermeer of iets dergelijks. Mocht die er komen dan kunnen ze daarin. Dqfn13 (talk) 21:13, 18 September 2013 (UTC)

---

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey. Dear Dqfn13, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time. Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:2-euromunt-dubbelportret.jpg

Eleassar (t/p) 23:08, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Koningstientje.jpg

Yours sincerely, Eleassar ^(t/p) 08:07, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Tulpenvijfje.jpg

And also:

• File:Vrede-van-utrecht-az.jpg
• File:Vrede-van-utrecht-vz 01.jpg

Yours sincerely, Eleassar ^(t/p) 08:09, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Yeah, why not ignore the CC-BY-zero policy of the Dutch government! Just make a speedy deletion and don't wait. Dqfn13 (talk) 20:11, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

Netherlands coat of arms

Do not interfere in something you do not understand. The way I have sorted them, Hens Bolens' two images are together and Sodacan's 10 images are together. The way you and him are edit warring, his images are all over the place. Fry1989 ^eh? 18:05, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

Images are to be sorted on alphabetical order, not in series you've made up. Dqfn13 (talk) 18:07, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

You don't have a clue what you're talking about, this is done all the time! Sodacan's 10 images are a set, they are supposed to be together. Hens Bolens' two images are a set, they should be together. Fry1989 ^eh? 18:10, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

If Henk (that's with a k) doesn't categorize his coa's as sets. So don't do things you are not supposed to. And don't think I don't know shit about this because I'm here for over 4 years and over 5 years on wikipedia writing about coa's... Dqfn13 (talk) 18:15, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

Except that Henk did, so maybe you don't know as much as you think. Fry1989 ^eh? 19:01, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

He didn't sort them as a serie... Dqfn13 (talk) 19:04, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

No, he just tried to sort them at the top because he and yourself think his are so much superior. I have no problem with them being at the top, bottom, middle or wherever else, but I do have a problem with them being mixed up with Sodacan's works which are a set whether you think so or not. Fry1989 ^eh? 19:10, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

Fine, at least I've stopped the editwar. Also, next time try to think why Henk sorts his files at the top... maybe his are better and do follow the ruled made in the Dutch heraldry, because those rules do have a reason. Dqfn13 (talk) 19:20, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

---

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey! Dear Dqfn13, Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests! In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days. And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy! Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Autopatrol given

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, the possibility to overwrite files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. Natuur12 (talk) 22:18, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

Bedankt Natuur12, doet me goed om dat toegezegd te krijgen... na ruim 1000 bestanden en ik weet niet hoeveel wijzigingen ;-) . Dqfn13 (talk) 08:30, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

Ja. Het lijkt me niet nodig om al jouw bewerkingen te controleren ;). Natuur12 (talk) 10:59, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

Hihi, nee... anders zou dat op nl.wiki ook maar weer moeten :P. Dqfn13 (talk) 17:12, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

File:10 gulden Frans Hals.JPG

File:10 gulden Frans Hals.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Pbech (talk) 02:05, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

File:10 gulden IJsvogel.JPG

File:10 gulden IJsvogel.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Pbech (talk) 02:06, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open!

• ⧼Wikibase-terms/Dqfn13⧽: Deutsch, Ελληνικά, English, ‎français, magyar, ‎italiano, македонски, ‎‎日本語, ‎‎‎русский, ‎‎‎svenska

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on 7 March 2014. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:MyLanguage/Commons:Picture_of_the_Year/2013/Introduction/en Click here to learn more and vote »]

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

vatican coat of arms

Please let's not start a new edit war , but that coat of arms is not real, that shield is totally invented --Gambo7 (talk) 09:46, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

The shapes of shields are not set, everybody can design their own form of the escution. Dqfn13 (talk) 09:48, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

In classic heraldry maybe, but not when it becomes a registered official national emblem. National emblems are not freely changeable. --Gambo7 (talk) 09:52, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

I've written over 400 articles on COA... I've never read anything about the shape begin set or registered... specially not in Italy (including Vatican City and San Marino). Dqfn13 (talk) 09:55, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

Find a proof that national emblems can have different shapes and we are ok --Gambo7 (talk) 09:57, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

Here a pointed escution and here a rounded shield. And to make it complete this one has a flat underside with a point. I know for sure that one was even placed on official buildings like the Koninklijke Nederlandse Munt (Royal Dutch Mint). Dqfn13 (talk) 10:03, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

I also found an oval shaped one used on the gates of one of the royal palaces in The Hague... the royal crest is the same as the national crest. Dqfn13 (talk) 10:07, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

Those are royal emblems and are subject to the usual free heraldic changes.

The Fundamental Law of Vatican City says that the emblem has to be according to the model pictured in it. I'll post in the talk page of the file so it can be openly discussed by those who would like to intervene. --Gambo7 (talk) 10:14, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

These so called royal emblems are also the coat of arms of the country... it happens to be one and the same. But show me the law of Vatican City and I'll stop talkig about that perticular one. Dqfn13 (talk) 10:20, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

I posted on the TP of the file --Gambo7 (talk) 10:54, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

I've seen it, I'm at my work, so I can't react to eleborate. Als my Italian and knowladge of the Italian/Vatican laws are too slim. I've read the translations and I can't realy see anyting saying the shape of the escution should be like shown. This is my last reaction for now, I'll react from 6pm and later (so in about 6 hours from now). Dqfn13 (talk) 10:57, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement

Picture of the Year 2013 Results

• In other languages: Deutsch, ‎español, ‎français, ‎日本語, Nederlands, русский, ‎svenska, ‎Türkçe, ‎українська

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Dqfn13,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

• In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
• In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:59, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Over Commons:Deletion requests/File:Royal Standard of the Kingdom of France.svg

De overlapping gebeurt in beide bestanden (kijk naar de middelste boog van de Ssolbergj-versie), en ook in de bronbestanden. Het geheel is een vlag, dat zulke reguleringen jammer genoeg niet eens kent (er zijn hoogstens wat ontwerpprincipes die tegenwoordig aangenomen worden). Zelfs in de heraldiek worden die reguleringen niet zelden genegeerd. Zonder overlapping een geornamenteerd wapen plaatsen op een lelieveld lijkt me niet mogelijk zonder het patroon te verstoren, wat natuurlijk aantoont hoe een onzinnig concept deze vlag in het algemeen is. Het plaatsen van een wapen met externe ornamenten op een veld is sowieso al een bedenkelijke praktijk. Een banier met het heraldisch correcte, en vanop afstand zichtbare Franse wapen, had een veel betere keuze geweest. Als encyclopedisch project dienen we echter het jammerlijke bestaan van zulke vlaggen te erkennen, zoals we ook doen met de vreselijk beladen kerkelijke heraldiek die wijlen aartsbisschop Bruno Heim zo terecht bekritiseerde. Lemmens, Tom (talk) 20:34, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

Ik zie dat er ook overleg is gestart bij Natuur12, zullen we daar verder overleggen, om de boel centraal te houden? Dqfn13 (talk) 21:06, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:DEU Stadtlohn COA.svg

Hi there - after we sorted out the problems regarding proper licensing of this file, I would like to ask you to withdraw the DR. --Maxxl2 - talk 11:47, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

Hi Maxx12, I won't take back the request as the first and third versions are still illegal and should be deleted. Dqfn13 (talk) 11:53, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

Please be informed that it is technically impossible on commons to delete former uploads as this limitation is to keep proper record of the overall development. A deletion request applies only to the present file. --Maxxl2 - talk 12:10, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

Then the entire file should be deleted and the current version reupoaded. Dqfn13 (talk) 12:12, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

As I am only third party and not involved, I'll wait for the final decision of the admins. AFAIK the decision will be a keep as good faith will be asumed. I just wanted to settle a mutual, friendly agreement. What a bummer. --Maxxl2 - talk 12:25, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

Good faith while it is obvious illegal to recreate that seal? Dqfn13 (talk) 12:27, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

It is not illegal to create and store a seal of German governmental authorities on commons. As you see Category:Seals_of_Cologne here, commons keeps thousands of German seals in various formats. There is no problem or conflict with any regulations as far as the proper license template:PD-Seal-Germany is enabled. --Maxxl2 - talk 12:57, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

You clearly haven't read the site of Stadtlohn. They use it as logo, and logos are protected. Dqfn13 (talk) 12:59, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

Wir brauchen beide dem Umweg über die Englische Sprache nicht. Als 1/4-Westfriese verstehe ich deine Sprache so gut, wie meine geliebte Großmutter (geboren in Leeuwarden)) es mich lehren konnte. :)

Auf der ganzen Website steht nirgendwo das Wort Logo nur Wappen, Fahne, Siegel in Bezug auf das Stadtwappen. Es handelt sich eindeutig nur um das Wappenschild, das seit 1909 in der unveränderten Blasonierung hier wiedergegeben wird. --Maxxl2 - talk 13:14, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

The Westfries you are talking about is Frysk, which I do not speak as I am from North Holland. I am from West-Friesland. The site of Stadtlohn talks about the official coat of arms and the one they use now... the last one is clearly being used as a logo. It is even called the daily coat of arms. Maybe you should ask the city if it is the official coat of arms or the logo. Dqfn13 (talk) 13:36, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:10 gulden 1941.JPG

Yours sincerely, Vera ^(talk) 15:31, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

[1]

It wasn't a matter of interest or not, but whether or not I wanted to help you. I was trying to decide, and forgot about your offer before I was able to answer. And while I can appreciate your attempt to send out an olive branch, I really want you to understand why I was hesitant.

Your colleagues drove me off of the Dutch Wikipedia for the crime of trying to contribute, using a rule that exists no-where else on Wikimedia. A rule so archaic that practically any edit which changes an article can be interpreted as going against the wishes of the original creator and therefore must be reverted. I know you have said that is an oversimplification, but I have to disagree and allow me to give you an example. File:Royal Standard of Belgium (1993–2013).svg is superior to File:Personal Standard of King Albert II of Belgium.svg in virtually every way, and even more important it is part of an identical set of Belgian royal standards which File:Personal Standard of King Albert II of Belgium.svg does not match. And yet, it is still used on this gallery with the other 4 files that all share a common design and this file does not. There should be no controversy about all 5 files matching, and nobody can even give a real reason against it, so instead they used that rule to revert me without cause and threaten me with blocks. As I attempted to point out on my talk page as well, this rule would make it impossible for me to improve and expand other articles where nobody can give any real reason against my contributions but did so anyway just to harass me, most likely because of nationalistic and linguistic motivation. You were part of that, and what I can not describe as anything less than a "gang" forced me to request my own user account be blocked on the Dutch Wikipedia giving me no possible alternative to contribute there.

I have tried to explain this to you before and you brush it off every time saying I just don't understand BTNI properly. Until you can understand what it feels like to be bullied off of a Wiki when you did nothing wrong and had the best possible intentions by users who are abusing a rule just to revert edits on sight whether or not they were positive, you cannot understand my hesitation to want to help you with anything. I don't expect you to agree, but please try and look at it from my side: Having all of your edits undone (even ones that were later reverted back to when it was decided they were positive) immediately, and users telling you that you don't belong there based on what languages you speak. Please just try to imagine that.

In any case, I can not directly extract these signs but I will see what I can do to construct them myself. Fry1989 ^eh? 01:34, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for taking the efford of creating the files from scratch, I realy appreciate it. I just had a look at the wiki page and they are still not placed there, so probably also not created yet.

I understand your hessitation, I would feel the same. Adding new information is not BTNI, so after creating the files you could add them... except you are blocked untill June next year. You can give me a heads up and I'll add the files.

I'm not going to discuss it all over. Okay, I'll summerice it for the last time: BTNI is about making small eddits who do not add information but only change the "looks", such as files who don't have to be changed unless they are clearly wrong. The differences between the two royal standards are only visually, changing one for the other would be BTNI. On nlwiki it is about correct informtion, not about having the same looks or using one set. In case of the road signs: they'll add new information so BTNI won't be even close. In case of quenstions about the road signs... just ask. Dqfn13 (talk) 08:47, 8 November 2014 (UTC)

• File:Nederlands verkeersbord F21.svg
• File:Nederlands verkeersbord F22.svg

---

• File:Nederlands verkeersbord F11.svg
• File:Nederlands verkeersbord F12.svg
• File:Nederlands verkeersbord F13.svg
• File:Nederlands verkeersbord F14.svg
• File:Nederlands verkeersbord F15.svg
• File:Nederlands verkeersbord F16.svg
• File:Nederlands verkeersbord F17.svg
• File:Nederlands verkeersbord F18.svg
• File:Nederlands verkeersbord F19.svg
• File:Nederlands verkeersbord F20.svg

I will upload the others soon. I will not be able to create L20 and L21 unless I can find the needed SVG elements, but the rest of them should turn out ok. Fry1989 ^eh? 03:38, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

Thanks, I have placed the two files already. Dqfn13 (talk) 14:45, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

Here are the others. Fry1989 ^eh? 20:57, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

Thank you very much, I realy appreciate it. Dqfn13 (talk) 21:13, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

If you have any future requests, I will certainly do them for you if I can. I wish I could make the last two but I can't find the elements I need so you will need to request a more experienced user create them. Fry1989 ^eh? 21:46, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

Thanks. I don't expect any new roadsigns soon, but you'll be the first to know if I need any. Dqfn13 (talk) 22:11, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

• File:Nederlands verkeersbord F10 (v1).svg
• File:Nederlands verkeersbord F10 (v2).svg

Here are two more I have created. Fry1989 ^eh? 20:12, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

Added the one with only Douane (customs in English). Dqfn13 (talk) 20:26, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

Vraagje

Hallo Dqfn13, ik ben de laatste tijd niet meer zo actief op Commons maar heb recent een afbeelding genomineerd voor verwijdering en toen gebeurde dit. Het lijkt me niet dat een anoniem kan besluiten dat een nominatie wordt afgewezen. Jij lijkt wat actiever op Commons, weet jij wat ik hier mee kan doen? - Robotje (talk) 07:08, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

Hoi Robotje, ook hier is dat alleen aan de moderatoren om een dergelijk besluit te nemen. Jcb heeft het dan ook teruggedraaid. Dqfn13 (talk) 08:21, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

Beide bedankt. - Robotje (talk) 12:16, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

verkeerscode and wegenforum

There are many old Dutch signs here, if you know someone who can make them. I offered them to Bouwe Brouwer but they just ignored me. Fry1989 ^eh? 18:23, 15 December 2014 (UTC)

Well... I know Archmedus (Arch/Henk Boelens) is able to create things from scratch. I don't know which signs there are on the photo's, but not on the list on nlwiki, maybe if you pin point them to me I can ask Arch. Or you show how brave you are and ask yourself, he is here to improve the encyclopedia, so he might be cooperative. Dqfn13 (talk) 08:49, 16 December 2014 (UTC)

File:Skandar Keynes.jpg

File:Skandar Keynes.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Denniss (talk) 16:52, 21 December 2014 (UTC)

Overcategorising

Category:Relief of Maurice of Nassau in The Hague is a category of Category:Bridge GW 61 Herenbrug. See File:The Hague Bridge GW 61 Herenbrug (06).JPG‎ --Stunteltje (talk) 09:15, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

Hoi Stunteltje, je kan hier Nederlands schrijven hoor. Dat had ik nog geen eens goed bekeken, komt mede doordat ik het idee kreeg dat het monument er los van stond. Dqfn13 (talk) 09:40, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

Het kan, maar meestal doe ik het hier in het Engels, op de volautomaat. Het beeld staat tegen de leuning van de brug. Als je even verder loopt, richting provinciehuis, zit daar ook een brug met veel beelden. Daar zijn ze nog nadrukkelijker van de brug zelf. --Stunteltje (talk) 09:44, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

Zo ver ben ik nog niet geweest om foto's te maken. Maar wie weet komt dat ook nog een keer, ik ben elke weekend in Den Haag dus kan ook foto's gaan maken op verzoek . Ik ben vorig jaar één keer langs het provinciehuis gelopen onderweg naar Scheveningen, maar kan me daar geen brug herinneren. Dqfn13 (talk) 09:57, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

Category:Bridge GW 65 Dierentuinbrug --Stunteltje (talk) 10:30, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

Okay, nee... die ken ik niet nee. Weet je toevallig ook meer over de brug bij het Westeindeziekenhuis? Tot nu toe staan er twee van de vier beelden van onwiki, beide foto's van Wikifrits. Ik heb de andere twee wel al gemaakt. Dqfn13 (talk) 10:37, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

• 
• 

Ze horen bij GW 15 Zie: nl:Lijst_van_bruggen_in_Den_Haag en Category:Bridge GW 15 Westeinde-Loosduinseweg. --Stunteltje (talk) 10:57, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

Super! Dank je wel, dan kan ik daar een paar nieuwe foto's van uploaden namelijk. Dqfn13 (talk) 11:00, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

Hulpvraag

Beste Dqfn13, ik heb geprobeerd een archief aan te maken. Lukt me niet. Zou je mij willen helpen/coachen? Wanneer je tijd hebt natuurlijk. Haagschebluf (talk) 18:26, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Hoi Haagschebluf, waar wil je dat archief aanleggen en waarvoor? Ik wil je best helpen, maar moet wel meer weten. Dqfn13 (talk) 18:39, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Allereerst bedankt dat je me wilt helpen. Ik kreeg al eerder de tip van Arch. Ik wil graag een archief op mijn overleg van Commons. Zoiets als Arch heeft, die hevelt heel regelmatig naar zijn archief. Dat maakt de overlegpagina toch wel een stuk overzichtelijker. En alle onderwerpen blijven onder bereik.

Het is me gelukt het kluisje op mijn OP te krijgen. Ook de jaartallen. Daarna ging het helemaal mis. Haagschebluf (talk) 19:10, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Zo te zien gaat het prima. Nu is het zaak om met de hand het oude overleg te verplaatsen. Hoe het met een bot kan weet ik ook niet. Als ik op de rode 2013 klik kom ik gewoon op User talk:Haagschebluf/Archive2013 en dat is een prima archiefpagina. Dqfn13 (talk) 19:16, 8 March 2015 (UTC)

Beste Dqfn13, ik denk dat ik het archief in orde heb. Ik had in de titel 2x User talk: staan. Ik denk dat dat de oorzaak was. Ik kwam op een verkeerde pagina terecht. Inmiddels zijn mijn jaartallen blauw en gevuld. Bedankt voor het meedenken. Haagschebluf (talk) 09:42, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Altijd bereid om iemand ergens mee op weg te helpen. Soms is een extra stel hersenen net nodig om een klein foutje te ontdekken. Dqfn13 (talk) 10:41, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Vaak valt het kwartje spontaan als je uiteindelijk om hulp vraagt. Ook een nachtje erover slapen wil wel eens helpen. Haagschebluf (talk) 11:45, 9 March 2015 (UTC)

Coachvraag

Beste Dqfn13

Ik dacht dat ik enkele dagen geleden een bedankje van jou voorbij zag komen. Ik voel me zeer vereerd. En je hebt eerder ook gezegd dat je altijd hulpvaardig bent. Daarom wil ik vragen of als ik weer bij kan dragen aan wiki of jij mij dan wilt coachen. Arch heeft eerder ook al eens hulp aangeboden. Maar die is denk ik momenteel wel erg druk. Dus als jij dat zou willen? Haagschebluf (talk) 14:29, 21 March 2015 (UTC)

Hoi Haagschebluf, als je vragen hebt kan je die gewoon stellen. Ik geef altijd eerlijk antwoord. In de weekenden ben ik overigens bijna niet online (dan heb ik het druk met aandacht geven aan mijn partner), dus vandaar ook deze late reactie. Dqfn13 (talk) 15:57, 23 March 2015 (UTC)

Beste Dqfn13, excuus voor late reactie is overbodig. Er zijn belangrijkere zaken dan wiki in het leven. Zeker een partner. Wat betreft mijn coachvraag, ik had begrepen dat als mijn blokkade ooit opgeheven wordt en ik weer op wiki actief wil zijn dat ik dan een coach zou moeten nemen. Vandaar mijn vraag. Haagschebluf (talk) 14:09, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Klopt, maar de vragen die je nu hebt zijn hier op Commons. Als je weer actief wordt op nlwiki dan kan je tegen die tijd aldaar mij vragen jou te coachen, of iemand anders die misschien beter bij jouw vragen past. Dqfn13 (talk) 19:59, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Ja je hebt gelijk. Als mijn blokkade opgeheven is zal ik jou als coach vragen. Ik ga dan eerst een archief aanleggen. Schoon schip maken. En ik wil wat ik aan wil maken eerst in kladblok doen. Doe jij dacht ik ook. Haagschebluf (talk) 15:01, 28 March 2015 (UTC)

Alles waar ik mee bezig ben heb ik op mijn kladblok staan ja. Sommige dingen staan er lang, andere wat korter. Zodra ik iets heb wat op een bruikbaar artikel begint te lijken gooi ik op mijn kladblok: mocht ik er dan niet meer aan werken dan kan iemand anders het overnemen. Komt door wat er vorig jaar (of het jaar daarvoor) is gebeurd: toen hadden we in één jaar tijd 4 Wikipedianen die ons ontvielen. Dqfn13 (talk) 14:08, 29 March 2015 (UTC)

Monumenten tagging scriptje

Hey, Ik heb een uitbreiding op een gadget geschreven waarmee je makkelijk RM/GM templates aan afbeeldingen kan toevoegen. Misschien vind jij het ook handig? --Vera ^(talk) 13:30, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Ik zal er thuis eens naar kijken (zit nu op mijn werk), momenteel ben ik er iets minder mee bezig maar heb af en toe inderdaad van die vlagen dat ik erg veel monumentnummertjes plak. Bedankt in ieder geval. Dqfn13 (talk) 13:56, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

oorlogsgraven

Beste Dqfn13 Ik zie dat jij deze maakte deze.

Twee weken geleden maakte ik deze en ik heb een week geleden iets dergelijk op Heiderust Rheden gemaakt. (moet ik nog overzetten op wiki) Ik vroeg me af of je dat in de lijst Oorlogsmonumenten mag plaatsen. Haagschebluf (talk) 15:28, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

Je kan ze plaatsen in de nl:Lijst van begraafplaatsen met oorlogsgraven van de Commonwealth War Graves Commission in Nederland, mits ze ook echt daarbij horen. Gezien het type grafsteen, het logo e.d. zal dat wel zo zijn. Dqfn13 (talk) 15:45, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

Daar heb ik het reeds geplaatst. Ik denk wel dat ze daar bij horen. Er zit zo'n groen bordje op de ingangspoort. Haagschebluf (talk) 16:24, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

Prima, gezien de vorm lijkt het mij ook wel hoor. Maar denk er aan: het zijn geen oorlogsmonumenten, het zijn tenslotte grafstenen. Dqfn13 (talk) 17:24, 29 May 2015 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2015

Beste deelnemer,

Bedankt voor het insturen van jouw foto’s van cultureel erfgoed in het kader van Wiki Loves Monuments 2015. Een professionele jury kiest straks uit alle inzendingen de beste foto’s in drie categorieën: beste foto van een monument, beste foto van een ornament en beste foto van een Dudok monument. Daarnaast is er ook een speciaal klassement voor de inzenders van de meeste foto’s van unieke monumenten. Wil jij ook kans maken op één van de vele prijzen, beschikbaar gesteld door onze partners en sponsoren? Vergeet dan niet om op Wikimedia Commons, onder voorkeuren (rechts bovenin, naast je gebruikersnaam) het vinkje bij e-mail van andere gebruikers toestaan (onder het kopje e-mail in het gebruikersprofiel), aan te vinken. Alleen deelnemers met een e-mailadres maken kans op prijzen. Benieuwd welke prijzen je allemaal kunt winnen? Kijk dan op http://www.wikimedia.nl/projectpagina/prijzenoverzicht

Groeten,

De Wiki Loves Monuments werkgroep 2015 13:20, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

File:Zeedijk 7, Amsterdam.JPG

hi Dqfn,

In de beschrijving staat dat deze verwijderd kan worden. Wil je hem laten verwijderen of zou je de beschrijving willen aanpassen.

Mvg en dank, Basvb (talk) 18:04, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

Hoi Basvb, ik heb net even snel gekeken of het een monumentaal pand is: het is noch een rijks- noch een gemeentelijk monument en heeft dus volgens mij geen toegevoegde waarde voor het project. Wat mij betreft wordt het bestand dus echt verwijderd. Dat was in 2012 al mijn intentie, maar toen wist ik nog niets van de sjablonen af hier op Commons. Sindsdien heb ik me niet meer met het bestand bezig gehouden. Dqfn13 (talk) 19:21, 16 December 2015 (UTC)

Category:Grote Sluis, Hoorn

Had ik indertijd aangemaakt, maar op basis waarvan zou ik nu niet meer weten. Maar als je in de Database ‘Vaarwegen in Nederland’ (ViN) van Rijkswaterstaat Adviesdienst Verkeer en Vervoer (AVV) kijkt bij de Havens van Hoorn (253) op km. 1,41, dan noemt die hem "Kleine Oostsluis". Waarom zou hij dan toch "Category:Keersluis, Hoorn" moeten heten? Zie ook nl:Kleine Oostbrug. Jij, als inwoner van Hoorn, zal het vast beter weten dan ik. --Stunteltje (talk) 21:38, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

De brug heet in ieder geval Kleine Oostbrug (artikel is zelfs van mijn hand ), hoe de sluis heet weet ik helaas niet. Ik zie dat Vereniging Oud Hoorn wel de naam Kleine Oostsluis gebruikt in meerdere publicaties. Hoe het hernoemen op een goede manier hier gaat ben ik nog niet achter... misschien zou jij dat willen doen? Ik kan morgen nog wel even kijken of de sluis Kleine Oostsluis heet, maar ik weet het eigenlijk vrijwel zeker. Ik doe vrijwilligerswerk in het Stadhuis en heb daar een mooi archief tot mijn beschikking van reeds gepubliceerd materiaal zoals kranten e.d. Dqfn13 (talk) 21:52, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

Er zijn verschillende methoden van hernoemen, maar ik ben al eens stevig op de vingers getikt bij gebruik van een verkeerde voor een schip. Sindsdien maak ik een nieuwe categorie aan in de oude, neem de oude categorieën over (en vul ze meestal aan) in de nieuwe. Pas bij de oude Cat-a-lot toe voor alle foto's, controleer in de nieuwe of het goed is gegaan en daarna {{category redirect|} in de oude categorie. Dan blijft de administratie bewaard, werd mij verzekerd. Ik wacht nu even af wat je bevindingen zijn. --Stunteltje (talk) 22:03, 14 March 2016 (UTC)

Ik heb een krantenartikel gevonden waarin over de Kleine Oostluis gesproken wordt. Verder gaat het altijd over de sluis onder de Kleine Oostbrug. De Grote Sluis heeft geen brug die dagelijks gebruikt wordt en dus heeft dat complex echt een eigen naam. Kleine Oostsluis lijkt mij wel de naam die prefereert. Dqfn13 (talk) 11:59, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

Category:Kleine Oostsluis aangemaakt en de bestanden overgezet op bovenstaande manier. Ik kan niet overzien welke foto's er nog bij over moeten vanuit Category:Grote Sluis, Hoorn of Category:Grote Sluis (Hoorn). Wel zie ik dat er ook een sluis Category:Grote Sluis, Harlingen bestaat, dus zonder haakjes bij de plaatsnaam. Maar dat komt veel meer voor. Is het tijd om dat te standaardiseren en zo ja, eerst discussie? Dat laat ik dan graag aan jou over. --Stunteltje (talk) 20:16, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

Ik zal kijken wat er nog overgezet moet worden uit de categorieën. Standaardiseren zal denk ik moeilijk worden, sommige mensen die hier iets uploaden komen nooit naar nlwiki en wat wij beslissen op nlwiki is hier geen maatstaf. Ook heb ik gezien dat er soms mensen uit andere taalgebieden de categorieën hier aanmaken omdat zij zien dat er een categorie ontbreekt. Soms zijn er zelfs lege categorieën aangemaakt (zoals Category:Gemeentelijke monumenten in Zeevang dat ik heb laten verwijderen), omdat die dan passen in de categorieboom. Dqfn13 (talk) 09:29, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

File:Borstbeeld Cornelis Drebbel, Alkmaar.JPG

The work is still under copyright and the author is still living, so it is only polite to name him in the Author line. Also, while it is correct that he is named in the file description, that is in Dutch. Naming him in the Author line makes it easy for those of us who don't read Dutch to know his name. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:41, 4 June 2016 (UTC)

The author of the bust is indeed Van Onna, but in this case the author of the photograph is intended, and that's not Van Onna, but me.

You could have just asked me to translate the file discription for you... I've actually never seen a file before where the author of the subject was mentioned, instead of the photographer. Dqfn13 (talk) 17:46, 5 June 2016 (UTC)

Beelden in Edam

Beeld Kaasdragers, Edam

Hoi Dqfn13, via OTRS ticket:2017021910008823 kwam de melding dat het bijgaande beeld is gemaakt door Jans van Baarsen. Ik heb dat aangepast, ook op het artikel w:nl:Lijst_van_beelden_in_Edam-Volendam. Mocht het niet juist zijn, kan je dat dan even laten weten (met ping svp)? Er schijnt ook een beeld van haar te zijn bij Jan Sombroek (Cas), de muziek en boekhandel op het Pellersplein, met als titel "Klaassie en Klaassie". Voor het geval je nog eens in de buurt bent . Nu nog een artikel over haar.... Met vriendelijke groet, Elly (talk) 22:20, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Klaassie en Klaassie, Volendam

Hoi Ellywa, ik heb Klaassie en Klaassie ook eens gefotografeerd. In Volendam staan meer beelden van Van Baarsen, waaronder De Bap en 't Ootje die aan de Haven staan. Ik heb niet snel plannen om weer naar Edam te gaan, maar zodra ik meer hoor over gemeentelijke monumenten in Eda, dan ga ik er wel weer heen. Het is ongeveer een half uur met de bus, dus het is prima te doen voor me. Helaas is op deze oude foto het tekstbordje niet goed leesbaar. Dqfn13 (talk) 22:27, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Dank je Dqfn! Het zijn leuke beelden. Elly (talk) 22:49, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Het zijn heel lieve beelden ja. Eigenlijk moet ik wel weer een keer daarheen om alleen maar nieuwe foto's van de beelden te maken, kwalitatief zijn de huidige niet zo goed namelijk. Daarnaast zijn nog lang niet alle gemeentelijke monumenten in Volendam gefotografeerd... Dqfn13 (talk) 22:54, 23 February 2017 (UTC)

Fotodag Bibliotheek Kennemerwaard (Egmond aan Zee)

Bedankt voor het begeleiden van de fotodag in Bibliotheek Kennemerwaard. We hopen je weer te zien op een toekomstige bijeenkomst! Michelle Boon (talk) 12:14, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

Whahaha, ga je nu ook dit soort officiële berichtjes sturen :'D. Dqfn13 (talk) 12:17, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

Oude bouwdelen naast lift Amersfoort

Hoi Dqfn13. Volgens mij klopt de beschrijving hier niet. Ergens anders vandaan gekopieerd? Groet, Apdency (talk) 19:41, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

Hoi Apdency, die beschrijving komt nog van een ander bestand ja... namelijk van dit bestand. Ik zal het straks aanpassen. De tekst daar is overigens door Ronn aangepast. Dqfn13 (talk) 19:45, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

Music schools in the Netherlands

Dag Dqfn13, Bedankt voor de tip mbt de muziekschool aan de Noorderstraat 3 in Hoorn die nu in de categorie van Nederlandse muziekscholen is opgenomen. --Elgewen (talk) 19:58, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

Top. Fijne avond. Dqfn13 (talk) 20:04, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2017 is weer begonnen!

Beste Dqfn13,

Wiki Loves Monuments 2017 is vorige week begonnen! Aan deze fotowedstrijd nemen dit jaar 54 landen deel, waaronder bijvoorbeeld Nederland, Groot Brittannië, Thailand, Rusland, Oekraïne, maar ook de eilanden Aruba, Bonaire, Curaçao, Saba, Sint Eustatius en Sint Maarten in de Nederlandse Caribean. Je wordt dus van harte uitgenodigd om te kijken tussen de deelnemende landen of jouw vakantieland er ook bij zit dit jaar en je foto's uit die landen ook te delen!

Net als voorgaande jaren hebben we prijzen voor de mooiste foto en de meeste foto's en een keus gemaakt voor een speciale categorie. Heb jij een foto gemaakt van een monument waarvan voor 1 september 2017 nog geen afbeelding op Wikimedia Commons bestond? Dan doet de afbeelding mee in de speciale categorie! Heeft een monument nog geen foto in de monumentenlijst op Wikipedia, dan is het aannemelijk dat we er nog geen foto van hadden. Om het zoeken naar monumenten zonder afbeelding wat makkelijker te maken, kun je op Wikipedia lijsten en een kaart van Nederland vinden.

Tot slot nodigen we je nog van harte uit om volgende week met ons op pad te gaan. Op zaterdag 16 september wandelen we tijdens een Wiki Takes rond in Hoorn: op zondag 17 september doen we hetzelfde in Leiden. Onder ervaren gidsen wandelen we langs monumenten in de stad en nemen we ruimschoots de tijd om de monumenten goed op de foto te zetten. Aanmelden verplicht en plaatsen gelimiteerd!
Tot en met 30 september heb je de tijd om je foto's up te loaden: de top 10 gaat door naar de internationale wedstrijd, waar de hoofdprijs de nieuwste Canon EOS 5D camera is!

Veel succes gewenst,
het Nederlandse Wiki Loves Monuments team 17:42, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

File:Beeld Johannes, St. Nicolaaskerk, Lutjebroek.JPG

Beste Dqfn13, v.m. moet dat de evangelist Johannes zijn en niet de Doper vanwege de kelk als attribut. Groeten, --Wikiwal (talk) 17:16, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

Gezien de categorie met andere kelk-vasthoudende-heiligen zal het inderdaad zo zijn. Ik ben zelf niet vreselijk bekend met heiligen en leer het vooral terwijl ik rondloop terwijl ik foto's maak en met aanwezige mensen praat. Dqfn13 (talk) 18:43, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

Dankjewel voor de snelle reactie! De beschrijving "St. Johannes" kan misleidend zijn. Ik heb de beschrijving in het artikel over de kerk gewijzigd. Vg, --Wikiwal (talk) 19:11, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

Bedankt. Altijd prettig als iemand iets verbeterd. Dqfn13 (talk) 19:14, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

File:NHTM 38, SHM, Hoorn.jpg

File:NHTM 38, SHM, Hoorn.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eriksw (talk) 04:56, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

File:NHTM 38, SHM.jpg

File:NHTM 38, SHM.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eriksw (talk) 04:57, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

File:SHM 81, Hoorn.jpeg

File:SHM 81, Hoorn.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eriksw (talk) 04:59, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

File:SHM Loc 288.JPG

File:SHM Loc 288.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eriksw (talk) 05:00, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

File:SHM 5 Enkhuizen.JPG

File:SHM 5 Enkhuizen.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eriksw (talk) 05:02, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

File:B54 en SHM C 58.jpg

File:B54 en SHM C 58.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eriksw (talk) 05:05, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

File:SHM BC 51 en SHM BC 53.jpg

File:SHM BC 51 en SHM BC 53.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Eriksw (talk) 05:06, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

@Eriksw: , ik vind deze massanominatie op zijn minst onbeschoft te noemen. Daarnaast nomineer je afbeeldingen waar jij betere van hebt gemaakt, iets wat werkelijk nergens op slaat. De afbeeldingen door mij gemaakt zijn niet allemaal even goed, maar ze zijn niet overbodig omdat jij een betere versie hebt. Dqfn13 (talk) 18:45, 13 January 2019 (UTC)

File:Voorgevel Ruimzicht, Landsmeer.jpg

@Dqfn13: aangezien het pand nu klaarblijkelijk beschermd is, vroeg ik me af of je de beschrijving misschien kan updaten. Thnks. Lotje (talk) 09:51, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

Super! Ik zal het updaten. Bedankt voor de waarschuwing @Lotje: . Heb je toevallig ook een bron, want dan kan ik misschien meer updaten. Dqfn13 (talk) 18:26, 15 January 2019 (UTC)

@Dqfn13: op Lijst van rijksmonumenten in Hollands Kroon had ik het zien staan. Ik veronderstel dat daar ergens de bronnen vermeld zijn. Grts. Lotje (talk) 05:39, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

Dat is apart, want Landsmeer ligt niet in Hollands Kroon, maar is een eigen gemeente tussen Amsterdam en Purmerend. Ik heb blijkbaar wel kunnen vinden dat het pand aangewezen zou gaan worden als gmeentelijk monument, maar ik kan momenteel nog niet terug vinden dat het inmiddels is aangewezen. Dqfn13 (talk) 09:23, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

Okay, geen probleem, I leave in your capable hands Lotje (talk) 13:05, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

Userpage

Hallo Dqfn13 only me again... er staat een kleine typo op je userpage dacht ik: ...I'm in a nother city..., meen, moet zijn ...I'm in an other city... Lotje (talk) 13:33, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

Bedankt, ik heb het aangepast. Dqfn13 (talk) 20:49, 16 January 2019 (UTC)

File:Kerkelijk graf 1, Roermond.jpg

@Dqfn13: kan je de beschrijving anders formuleren? Iemand die geen bisschop op hulpbisschop was, is dit dan een priester? MarcoSwart dacht dit ook. Ik zou er nog de Category:Graves of Christians aan toevoegen. Wat denk je? Thnks Lotje (talk) 08:40, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

Hoi Lotje,

Monseigneur Van Meijel was huisprelaat van de paus. Hij was zelf niet werkzaam als priester o.i.d. Ik weet helaas niet meer of hij misschien zelfs een leek en dus niet gewijd was. Dqfn13 (talk) 19:48, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Leiter mit stiefeln, Vondelpark.jpeg

Yours sincerely, Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:00, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:The Joy of Life, Part two.jpg

Yours sincerely, Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:01, 2 August 2019 (UTC)

Important message for file movers

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

• To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
• To perform file name swaps.
• When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:35, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

File:Logo S.V. Always Forward Hoorn.JPG

File:Logo S.V. Always Forward Hoorn.JPG has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that. The file you added may soon be deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please replace the copyvio tag with {{subst:OP}} and have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you disagree that the file is a copyright violation for any other reason, please replace the copyvio tag with a regular deletion request. This file is a copyright violation for the following reason: NOT a simple logo. Still under copyrights by its rightful owner. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

 

Glorious 93 (talk) 18:31, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

Hi Glorious 93, thanks for your work on Commons. The photograph wasn't only of the logo, but also of the brick wall surrounding it, making it a photo of an outdoor sign. In case I had cropped the photo, it would have been a copyright violation. Dqfn13 (talk) 19:15, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

Hi Dqfn13, I totally understand your point. However, the logo of the club sims to be here the focus of attention and not the brick wall surrounding it, mainly due to the zoom level, unfortunately. 😕 In any case, if you still think that my judgement here was unfair, you can still challenge the speedy deletion of the file and turn it into a normal proposal, so that other users can also give their opinion on the matter. 😇 --Glorious 93 (talk) 19:21, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

Don't you worry Glorious 93, Túrelio already made their decision. The file was kept. All objects in the Netherlands that are meant to be permanently in public space, such as this sign, are in public domain. Dqfn13 (talk) 19:30, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

Computer aide taqgging

Hoi Dqfn13

Ik zie dat je Computer-Aided Tagging gebruikt, voor onder andere File:Achterweteringseweg 70, Maartensdijk 02.jpg, di je tagt met wolk (Q8074), planten (Q756), gras (Q643352), hemelgewelf (Q527), gebouw (Q41176), woonhuis (Q3947) en boom (Q10884). Dat zijn niet erg nuttige tags. Wat de afbeelding werkelijk afbeeld is Gepleisterde boerderij (Q17418009) Rijksmonument op Achter Weteringseweg 70. Naar mijn menig is Computer-Aided Tagging veel te vaag om te gebruiken voor heel specifieke zaken, als monumenten. HenkvD (talk)

Commons geeft zelf die tags, ik vind ze ook niet echt nuttig, maar een echt nuttige tag als monument of boerderij komt er nooit langs. En omdat Commons die tags maar bij me blijft pushen (het liefst doe ik er niks mee) zal ik ze blijkbaar moeten plaatsen. Dqfn13 (talk) 19:24, 14 February 2021 (UTC)

Ik denk dat je dit kunt uitschakelen via Voorkeuren - Meldingen - Gesuggereerde tags ter beoordeling. Laat het vakje leeg. HenkvD (talk) 11:17, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

Ik zal er eens naar kijken, bedankt voor de tip. Dqfn13 (talk) 22:18, 17 February 2021 (UTC)

File:Eftelinggrandhotel.jpg nominatie

Hoi Dqfn13 (weet dat je Nederlands kent),

Je hebt bovengenoemd plaatje verwijderd. Snap ik. Nu heb ik de vraag of dit misschien ook weg kan: File:Dansemacabre.png Ik heb namelijk geen flauw idee hoe dat werkt. Groempdebeer (talk) 15:26, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

Hoi Groempdebeer, hier op Commons klik je eerst op de knop Bewerken en daarna plaats je bovenaan het bewerkveld de volgende tekst: {{speedy|Image derived from Google Maps}} of vul in plaats van dat het van Google afgeleid is in dat het jouw eigen verzoek als aanmaker (request by uploader) is. Met vriendelijke groet, Dqfn13 (talk) 16:36, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

Oké, het gaat al mis bij het knopje bewerken vinden... Groempdebeer (talk) 12:23, 31 May 2022 (UTC)

@Groempdebeer: Bovenaan de pagina (in de browser), als je in de mobiele weergave werkt (op een smartphone of tablet) dan is het een potloodje. Dqfn13 (talk) 08:45, 1 June 2022 (UTC)

File:Beatles monument, Blokker.JPG

File:Beatles monument, Blokker.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

A1Cafel (talk) 04:40, 22 June 2023 (UTC)

Please have a look

It seems you did not notice what I expected you to notice in the document I linked.

Please have a look at the document. It has a section for the coat of arms of the Holy See ("Coat of Arms of the Holy See"), and another for the coat of arms of Vatican City ("Coat of Arms of the State of Vatican City"). As you can see, those two coats of arms are different, and the notable difference is the ropes. You have not noticed either that the document describes three things, one of which are the Vatican City coat of arms and the other being the Holy See coat of arms, as the header you have invoked says: "HIS HOLINESS FRANCIS HIS HOLINESS BENEDICT XVI HIS HOLINESS JOHN PAUL II Coat of Arms", "HOLY SEE Coat of Arms", and "STATE OF VATICAN CITY Flag, Coat of Arms and Seal".

Thus, could you please go on with the page move? Veverve (talk) 12:58, 26 September 2023 (UTC)

What I can see are three emblems: bleu, brown, red. No difference in shape or design. Those three are named Coat of Arms of the Holy See. Underneath that is a red shield with before shown design but in colours with a red rope, a silver key (dexter) and a gold key (sinister) crossed, on top of that all a white papal tiara. The exact same design as in the file you want to rename. That design on the site of the Vatican is named: Coat of Arms of the State of Vatican City. I don't know where you can see a red coat of arms with a golden key (on dexter) crossing a silver one (on sinister). Because that is the difference between CoA of Vatican City or CoA of the Holy See. Dqfn13 (talk) 13:09, 26 September 2023 (UTC)

The difference between the coat of arms of the Holy See and the coat of arms of the Vatican is not the keys. No official document or image states or implies this is the distinctive sign. The difference between the two CoAs is where the ropes hang. The ropes hang in the middle when it is the Holy See CoA, they hang a each key's extremity when it is the Vatican CoA. Here is a schematic.

And putting the Holy See CoA behind a red shield does not turn it into the Vatican CoA, rather it turns the Holy CoA into the same Holy See CoA but behind a red shield. Veverve (talk) 13:28, 26 September 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for the clarification. I do see the difference now. Sorry for the big discussion, and thank you for giving me the chance to learn something new today. I have already moved the file for you. Dqfn13 (talk) 13:34, 26 September 2023 (UTC)

Thanks for taking the time to read my argumentation!

I have also requested file moves for the same reason, at: File:Emblem of the Vatican City.png, File:Emblem of Vatican City (2).svg, File:Emblem of Vatican City State.svg, File:Emblem of Vatican City.svg, File:Emblem of the Vatican City State.svg. could you also have a look at those? Veverve (talk) 13:43, 26 September 2023 (UTC)