User talk:AndreasPraefcke

Earlier entries: User talk:AndreasPraefcke/archive

Wie blasonierst du das?

Viele Grüße --Historiograf (talk) 01:18, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Signac - Portrait de Félix Fénéon.jpg, that you uploaded is now assessed as one of the finest pictures on Wikimedia Commons, the nomination is available at Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Signac - Portrait de Félix Fénéon.jpg. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate, please do so at this nomination page.

/FPCBot (talk) 21:04, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

Important message for file movers

A community discussion has been closed where the consensus was to grant all file movers the suppressredirect user right. This will allow file movers to not leave behind a redirect when moving files and instead automatically have the original file name deleted. Policy never requires you to suppress the redirect, suppression of redirects is entirely optional.

Possible acceptable uses of this ability:

• To move recently uploaded files with an obvious error in the file name where that error would not be a reasonable redirect. For example: moving "Sheep in a tree.jpg" to "Squirrel in a tree.jpg" when the image does in fact depict a squirrel.
• To perform file name swaps.
• When the original file name contains vandalism. (File renaming criterion #5)

Please note, this ability should be used only in certain circumstances and only if you are absolutely sure that it is not going to break the display of the file on any project. Redirects should never be suppressed if the file is in use on any project. When in doubt, leave a redirect. If you forget to suppress the redirect in case of file name vandalism or you are not fully certain if the original file name is actually vandalism, leave a redirect and tag the redirect for speedy deletion per G2.

The malicious or reckless breaking of file links via the suppressredirect user right is considered an abuse of the file mover right and is grounds for immediate revocation of that right. This message serves as both a notice that you have this right and as an official warning. Questions regarding this right should be directed to administrators. --Majora (talk) 21:35, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Street Somerset twin towns mural.jpg

Yours sincerely, C.Suthorn (talk) 13:02, 10 November 2019 (UTC)

Franz von Stuck:Salome

Du hast vor einiger Zeit mal eine bessere Version von dieser Salome hochgeladen. Nach persönlicher Betrachtung musste ich feststellen, dass die Leute beim Yorck-Project die Dame wohl ins Sanatorium geschickt haben ;-) --Wuselig (talk) 15:38, 18 November 2019 (UTC)

Category:Anton_of_Montfort-Pfannberg

Anton of Montfort-Pfannberg has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

NearEMPTiness (talk) 18:31, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

Daily gallery updater has failed on User:AndreasPraefcke/Bodenseekreis_new_files

Hello. This message is to inform you that a daily gallery in your userspace, User:AndreasPraefcke/Bodenseekreis_new_files, has failed. Due to software limitations, the bot has a hard upper-limit of about 6000 files per day (including overflow galleries), while your gallery had 18775 files.

This usually happens because a gallery is too broad, encompassing too many subcategories. Please review the logs here and request that a subcategory be excluded, or narrow your category choice(s).

Please make your request for removal within 4 days, or your gallery will be subject to removal.

Thank you. Magog the Ogre (via OgreBot (talk) 03:29, 11 December 2019 (UTC))

Daily gallery updater has failed on User:AndreasPraefcke/Bodenseekreis_new_files

Hello. This message is to inform you that a daily gallery in your userspace, User:AndreasPraefcke/Bodenseekreis_new_files, has failed. Due to software limitations, the bot has a hard upper-limit of about 6000 files per day (including overflow galleries), while your gallery had 18655 files.

This usually happens because a gallery is too broad, encompassing too many subcategories. Please review the logs here and request that a subcategory be excluded, or narrow your category choice(s).

Please make your request for removal within 4 days, or your gallery will be subject to removal.

Thank you. Magog the Ogre (via OgreBot (talk) 03:32, 12 December 2019 (UTC))

Daily gallery updater has failed on User:AndreasPraefcke/Bodenseekreis_new_files

Hello. This message is to inform you that a daily gallery in your userspace, User:AndreasPraefcke/Bodenseekreis_new_files, has failed. Due to software limitations, the bot has a hard upper-limit of about 6000 files per day (including overflow galleries), while your gallery had 17474 files.

This usually happens because a gallery is too broad, encompassing too many subcategories. Please review the logs here and request that a subcategory be excluded, or narrow your category choice(s).

Please make your request for removal within 4 days, or your gallery will be subject to removal.

Thank you. Magog the Ogre (via OgreBot (talk) 03:22, 13 December 2019 (UTC))

Daily gallery updater has failed on User:AndreasPraefcke/Bodenseekreis_new_files

Hello. This message is to inform you that a daily gallery in your userspace, User:AndreasPraefcke/Bodenseekreis_new_files, has failed. Due to software limitations, the bot has a hard upper-limit of about 6000 files per day (including overflow galleries), while your gallery had 16210 files.

This usually happens because a gallery is too broad, encompassing too many subcategories. Please review the logs here and request that a subcategory be excluded, or narrow your category choice(s).

Please make your request for removal within 4 days, or your gallery will be subject to removal.

Thank you. Magog the Ogre (via OgreBot (talk) 03:22, 14 December 2019 (UTC))

Category:Iron_curtain

Category:Iron_curtain has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Themightyquill (talk) 11:02, 3 February 2020 (UTC)

Guck mal

Aus File:Oskar Begas Portrait Mathilde Begas 1883.jpg wurde Elisabeth Heegewaldt, 1883, siehe https://www.imhof-verlag.de/media/catalog/product/pdfs/6edcd91c13bd8c582787ce32cea8e2ae_Oscar%20Begas_Blick%20ins%20Buch.pdf (Seite 53) Gruß Mutter Erde (talk) 14:25, 7 March 2020 (UTC)

Category:Benedict of Nursia

Hello Andreas,

Can i ask your opinion regarding this matter:you created this category "Category:Benedict of Nursia" and not "Category:Saint Benedict of Nursia"? Thank you, regards.--Carolus (talk) 10:00, 26 May 2020 (UTC)

It is about a real person, not a legendary creature. I don't believe in saints. --AndreasPraefcke (talk) 15:49, 18 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Jonathan Meese Humpty-Dumpty-Maschine Alte Nationalgalerie 01.jpg

File:Jonathan Meese Humpty-Dumpty-Maschine Alte Nationalgalerie 01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rlbberlin (talk) 01:30, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Jonathan Meese Humpty-Dumpty-Maschine Alte Nationalgalerie 02.jpg

File:Jonathan Meese Humpty-Dumpty-Maschine Alte Nationalgalerie 02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rlbberlin (talk) 01:30, 7 June 2020 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Ravensburg Heilig Kreuz 1.jpg

And also:

• File:Ravensburg Heilig Kreuz 2.jpg
• File:Ravensburg Heilig Kreuz Kruzifix.jpg

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 21:13, 8 June 2020 (UTC)

File:Adolph Kummer Brief aus Westafrika 1816.jpg

Hallo Andreas, mal ´ne kurze Frage. Wenn ich nicht irre, steckst Du hinter der Datei. Auch, wenn ich es bei Deinen unzähligen Beiträgen für eher unwahrscheinlich halte. Hast Du zufällig noch weitere Bilder des Briefes irgendwo gespeichert? Mich würden insbesondere die in der Beschreibung erwähnten Adressdaten interessieren. Auf Bassenge ist der Brief nach der langen Zeit leider nicht mehr zu finden. Vielen Dank im Voraus.--S. F. B. Morse (talk) 14:13, 12 July 2020 (UTC)

Nein, nur diese Datei, die "gerettet" wurde, weil sie eben bei den Auktionshäusern nach langer Zeit wie immer nicht mehr auffindbar ist... --AndreasPraefcke (talk) 16:23, 26 October 2020 (UTC)

Hallo Andreas, wie ich gerade sehe, hattest Du doch noch geantwortet. Ich danke Dir für diese Rettung. Adolph Kummer stammt hier aus der Region.--Viele Grüße aus EE S. F. B. Morse (talk) 20:05, 12 January 2021 (UTC)

File:Kroatischer Arbeitsdienst-Mann StAF W 134 Nr. 026025 Bild 1 (5-92161-1).jpg

File:Kroatischer Arbeitsdienst-Mann StAF W 134 Nr. 026025 Bild 1 (5-92161-1).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

94.216.58.195 04:31, 14 July 2020 (UTC)

File:Eduard Gaertner Schlossfreiheit.jpg

File:Eduard Gaertner Schlossfreiheit.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Oursana (talk) 22:04, 9 January 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Tettnang St Gallus innen 01.jpg

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 18:53, 11 January 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Leutkirch Stadtpfarrkirche Blick zum Chor.jpg

And also:

• File:Leutkirch Stadtpfarrkirche Seitenschiff Nord img01.jpg
• File:Leutkirch Stadtpfarrkirche Seitenschiff Süd img01.jpg
• File:Leutkirch Stadtpfarrkirche Seitenschiff Süd img02.jpg

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 18:32, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Leutkirch Stadtpfarrkirche Blick zum Chor.jpg

And also:

• File:Leutkirch Stadtpfarrkirche Hochaltar Kreuzigungsgruppe.jpg

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 18:37, 27 January 2021 (UTC)

Ravensburg: Frage zum Standort bei der Aufnahme eines Bildes

Hallo Andreas,

vielen Dank für Dein schönes Bild File:Ravensburg Mehlsack und Obertor.jpg

Im Wikipedia-Artikel Ravensburg lautet die Bildunterschrift: Blick von der Veitsburg: rechts das Obertor, links der Turm Mehlsack

Könntest Du das bitte prüfen? Ich habe meine Zweifel, dass es sich um den Blick von der Veitsburg handelt. Eventuell könntest Du den korrekten Standort mitteilen, von dem aus Du die Aufnahme gemacht hast?

Danke Dir und viele Grüße! --Olli1800 (talk) 21:14, 24 February 2021 (UTC)

Anfrage an den Support zu einem Bild

Moin Andreas,

über den Support erreicht uns eine Anfrage aus Kanada zu diesem Bild.

Sie kommt vom CONSEIL DU STATUT DE LA FEMME Québec (Québec) G1R 6E2

mit der offiziellen E-Mail-Adresse einer kanadischen Behörde.

Kannst Du bitte mit dem Betreff [Ticket#2021031110011805] eine E-Mail an permissions-fr@wikimedia.org schicken, damit wir Dich in die Kommunikation einbinden können? Und bitte kurz dazu schreiben, ob Französisch okay für Dich. Als Kanadierin können wir die Absenderin bestimmt auch bitten, auf Englisch umzuschalten.

Dafür dankbar, beste Grüße --Mussklprozz (talk) 08:35, 15 March 2021 (UTC)

Hat sich erledigt. Gruß, --Mussklprozz (talk) 15:26, 17 March 2021 (UTC)

Category:City_walls_of_Nördlingen

City walls of Nördlingen has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Zimtstern 2k (talk) 20:11, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

Zwei Fasnet-Bilder

Hi Andreas,
du hattest schon mal ein paar Freiburger Fastnet-Fotos von mir aus dem Jahr 2011 sortiert und beschriftet. Es sind noch zwei davon aufgetaucht -- wärest du in der Lage die auch so toll zu beschriften, wie du es mit den anderen gemacht hast? Es geht um diese 2 hier:

• File:Fasnet (6789721302).jpg
• File:Fasnet (6789728918).jpg

Das wäre toll! Danke dir, --Jcornelius (talk) 07:27, 12 June 2021 (UTC)

File:Nozze di Figaro Scene 19th century.jpg

File:Nozze di Figaro Scene 19th century.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Smerus (talk) 11:20, 22 July 2021 (UTC)

Category:Tracht

Tracht has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

JopkeB (talk) 03:39, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Wiki Science Competition 2021 in Switzerland

Logo for Wiki Science Competition

Dear uploader of Wiki Loves Earth in Switzerland and Wiki Loves Monuments in Switzerland, we would like to remind you that Wiki Science Competition 2021 has started in the whole world. It is now open in your country until December, 15th.

If you want to take part in WSC2021, please consult this page. There are different categories that can be used (you might therefore have something already interesting in your archive). Prizes can be allocated for the 1st and 2nd positions in every category.

If you are an expert user, we remind you that the images uploaded within the deadline can be included in any case in their national category even if not uploaded with the main interface by simply adding the national category.

If you take part, please consider improving the description in English of your files, since such description is what the international jury will use to evaluate them at the following step. World finalists will be finalized after March 2022.

Sorry for bothering you and have a nice wiki.

---

Message discussed here. If you do not want to receive these messages in the future, please unsubscribe from this list

---

Social media: Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Science&Wiki Wiki Science Competition
Hashtag: #WSC2021 #WikiScience #WikiScience2021

---

Alexmar983 (promotion team and academic committee) using MediaWiki message delivery--18:52, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

File:Heilandskirche Sacrow Atlas.jpg

File:Heilandskirche Sacrow Atlas.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Oursana (talk) 00:47, 1 January 2022 (UTC)

File:Sternsinger.jpg

File:Sternsinger.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

68.80.245.41 21:22, 4 January 2022 (UTC)

File:Otto Mueller Zwei Mädchen im Schilf.jpg

File:Otto Mueller Zwei Mädchen im Schilf.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 17:53, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Berlin-Steglitz Matthäuskirche innen.jpg

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 14:33, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

File:München Residenztheater Foyer.jpg

File:München Residenztheater Foyer.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin Sg. (talk) 18:32, 18 February 2022 (UTC)

Category:Saint_Andrew

Saint Andrew has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

129.242.129.238 08:34, 23 February 2022 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Bürgersaal Rupert Mayer.jpg

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 12:46, 10 April 2022 (UTC)

Category:Hans_Zatzka

Hans Zatzka has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

2001:1C01:221A:2F00:FC2E:31E6:7716:D8DF 08:15, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

Category:Writing

Writing has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Josh (talk) 20:53, 22 January 2023 (UTC)

File:Buchau-Kappel Kirche Abendmahl.jpg

File:Buchau-Kappel Kirche Abendmahl.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Maimaid (talk) 10:10, 12 February 2023 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

• File:Weingarten Marienkirche Blick zum Altar.jpg

Yours sincerely, Martin Sg. (talk) 20:53, 19 February 2023 (UTC)

File:Klosterkirche St Märgen Gedenkstein 1493.jpg

@AndreasPraefcke: kleine Frage: im Text lese ich Abbt Erhart Rotenkopf hat mich gebauen zwar. Soll das nicht Abbt Erhart Rotenkopf hat mich gehauen zwar sein? Thanks. :-) Lotje (talk) 07:51, 28 April 2023 (UTC)

Category:George_Cruikshank

George Cruikshank has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Geo Swan (talk) 20:37, 4 June 2023 (UTC)

File:Martin Schongauer, Christi Geburt (1480) (2).jpg

File:Martin Schongauer, Christi Geburt (1480) (2).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Oursana (talk) 16:40, 18 August 2023 (UTC)

Category:Coats_of_arms_of_Güs_von_Gusenberg_family

Category:Coats_of_arms_of_Güs_von_Gusenberg_family has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

GerritR (talk) 20:10, 7 September 2023 (UTC)

Category:Coats_of_arms_of_the_House_of_Sponheim

Coats of arms of the House of Sponheim has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

GerritR (talk) 15:46, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

File:Wappen Bodenseekreis.png

File:Wappen Bodenseekreis.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Rosenzweig τ 11:48, 19 September 2023 (UTC)